And 'the theme of a framework set out in the diocesan museum in Vienna. The artist Alfred Hrdlicka, self-described Stalinist and atheist . certainly do not want to publish the image of such a picture: I will not give any visibility and then my ignorance in art makes me shit a judge.
opposite view is that the author, after having compared to Leonardo da Vinci, said that no one is ever better than he creates a crucifix.
asked the audience who asked why the decision to depict scenes of homosexual orgy at the Last Supper, the old blasphemer responded because there were no women . Absurd
the irresponsible behavior of the bishop of Vienna, Cardinal. Schönborn: to allow the exposure of Stalin in a diocesan museum is already shameful. He added that has not even had the foresight to assess the work before displaying.
Erich Leitenberger, spokesman for the archdiocese of Vienna, after the outbreak of the event, was quick to say that the decision to exhibit some paintings does not mean approval of the content of the works.
Then you pass a sentence triumph of stupidity: I good that artists who do not believe or who are still looking for the answer of faith are dealt with biblical subjects .
read something like this I wonder if the Cardinal is taking us around or is totally insane.
Michelangelo worked on biblical subjects and his nudes are in the Sistine Chapel. The work of Hrdlicka
blasphemous is unworthy of a pornographic comic by two pounds. What
Hrdlicka picture all he wants in recent months that God will grant him. But a cardinal make the mistake of exposing scum like this can not go unpunished.
0 comments:
Post a Comment